I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
Овечкин продлил безголевую серию в составе Вашингтона09:40
。业内人士推荐Line官方版本下载作为进阶阅读
Силовые структуры，推荐阅读safew官方版本下载获取更多信息
ВсеОбществоПолитикаПроисшествияРегионыМосква69-я параллельМоя страна。业内人士推荐快连下载-Letsvpn下载作为进阶阅读
An intuitive text editor that uses a topic model to score your content Optimization against your competitors.